Governance for a sustainable business
How we govern our business
Bidvest embraces corporate governance as a way of life rather than a
set of rules. Stakeholders can only derive full, sustained value from a
business founded on honesty, integrity, accountability and transparency.
Bidvest prizes simplicity. Better focus makes it easier to manage your
business, which is the key focus in understanding good governance.
An appropriate structure that captures the talent and the energy
needed for continued growth without becoming unwieldy is the core
governance rationale behind the Bidvest divisional structure of Bidvest
South Africa (including 11 subdivisions and Bidvest Namibia), Bidvest
Foodservices (geographically divisionalised into four international
regions) and Bidvest Corporate.
Divisional leadership consists of a chief executive and finance director
tasked with guiding and directing each operating business within that
division. At a divisional level an assurance team comprising internal
audit and risk management exists to support the divisional leadership
team. Each division is governed through quarterly independently
chaired divisional committees including an audit committee and a risk
committee. These divisional subcommittees collate and report into the Group structure to ensure appropriate information and accountability is
brought to the ultimate Bidvest board.
Bidvest’s entrepreneurial flair has been a driving force that has fostered
growth in a variety of sectors, creating the Group as we know it today.
Bidvest believes in empowering people, building relationships and
improving lives. Entrepreneurship, incentivisation, decentralised
management and communication are the keys to delivering excellence
and innovation in all our business dealings.
How we integrate – the Bidvest four pillars
Bidvest recognises the value presented through the effective adoption
of an integrated approach to assurance and compliance. The adopted
governance, risk and compliance framework continues to form the
basis for how Bidvest manages the challenge of good governance in a
decentralised environment. The framework shows the achievement of a
sustainable entity facilitated by the integration of four basic pillars, being
governance, assurance, risk management and compliance, driven by
Group and divisional strategy, in compliance with legislated
requirements and reported through the established structures.
1. Governance
The Bidvest Group Limited is fully committed to the four values
underpinning good governance – responsibility, accountability, fairness
and transparency. The board charter, which is reviewed annually,
expresses the board’s commitment to meeting its responsibilities. While
retaining overall accountability, the Bidvest Group has spread the
burden of responsibility carried by the Group board and Group board committees down into the divisional structure where divisional
committees exist that are able to focus on the needs and strategies
within the division itself. Each division has its own audit committee and
risk committee operating under a delegated authority of the Group
committees. Reporting is consolidated and reported to the Group level
where the board is able to focus on the high-risk, high-impact areas.

The Bidvest Group governance manual lists the required charters, codes, policies and documents which are designed to guide the composition and responsibilities of the divisional governing bodies. In line with Bidvest’s decentralised structure divisional management will establish additional policies and procedures as are applicable to their specific environment.
Role and function of the board
Executive directors implement strategies and operational decisions. Non-executive directors provide an independent perspective and complement the skills and experience of executive directors. They objectively assess strategy, budgets, performance, resources, transformation, diversity, employment equity and standards of conduct. They also contribute to strategy formulation and decision making.
Collectively, the board believes the current mix of knowledge, skill and experience meets the requirements to lead Bidvest effectively. The board is chaired by an independent non-executive director and comprises a further 10 independent non-executive directors as well as seven executive directors. During the current year there were changes made to the composition of the board. Adv Pansy Tlakula retired from the board and Mrs Gillian Claire McMahon was appointed as an executive director. Considerable thought is given to board balance and composition.
In terms of the Company’s Memorandum of Incorporation (MoI), the directors who retire by rotation at the forthcoming AGM are Messrs Paul Cambo Baloyi, Alfred Anthony da Costa, Eric Kevin Diack, Alexander Komape Maditsi, Nigel George Payne and Mrs Cecilia Wendy Lorato Phalatse. All retiring directors are eligible for re-election.
The board functions in accordance with the requirements of King III and within the context of the Companies Act, the Listings Requirements of the JSE Limited and other applicable laws, rules and codes of governance. The board is responsible for, among other things, the governance of risk and information technology and has ensured that the Company has an effective, independent audit committee and an effective risk-based internal audit function. On the recommendation of the audit committee and the risk committee, the board has considered and approved the Company’s annual integrated report. Based on the report of the audit committee and the written assessment of the company’s internal auditor, the board is satisfied that the Company’s system of internal controls is effective.
Bidvest’s remuneration philosophy promotes the Group’s entrepreneurial culture within a decentralised environment with the aim of achieving sustainable growth within all businesses. The board defines the remuneration philosophy and aligns business strategy and objectives with the overall goal of creating shareholder value. A balance between employee and shareholder interests while supporting entrepreneurial drive to ensure fair and responsible remuneration practices is a key area of focus. The board carries ultimate responsibility for remuneration policy. The committee operates in accordance with a board-approved mandate. The board may refer matters for shareholder approval; for example, new and amended share-based incentive schemes and committee fees. During the year, the board accepted the recommendations made by the remuneration committee. Refer to the directors’ report on page 77 and the remuneration committee report on page 89.
The board confirms its compliance with specific governance requirements in the disclosures set out below:
| Appointment, induction
and ongoing training of
directors |
Any new appointment of a director is considered by the board, on the recommendation of the nominations
committee, to ensure a rigorous and transparent procedure. The selection process involves considering the existing
balance of skills and experience, and an ongoing process of aligning board composition with the strategy of the
Group as a whole. The company secretary arranges an appropriate induction programme for new directors. The
board supports the development of directors and training is available on an individual director’s requirements. |
| Board and board
committees’ performance
assessment |
Annually, the performance of the board as a whole and the board committees individually is appraised. The recent
performance assessment indicated that the board and the board committees are functioning effectively and efficiently.
No major issues were raised. |
| Independence of
non-executive directors |
The board comprises a majority of independent non-executive directors. The board considered the issue of
independence of directors in accordance with the rationale and meaning of the requirements of independence
according to King III. An assessment, considering the salient factors and unique circumstances of each director, was
performed for each non-executive director. Furthermore, the independence of non-executives who have served on the
board for longer than nine years was assessed.
The board is satisfied that all 11 non-executive directors are independent. |
| Chairman and chief
executive |
No individual has unfettered powers of decision making. Responsibility for running the board and executive
responsibility for conducting the business are differentiated. Mrs CWL Phalatse, a non-executive director, is chairman
of the board and Mr B Joffe, an executive director, is chief executive. The roles of the chairman and chief executive
are thus separate and clearly defined. |
| Prescribed officers |
Due to the nature and structure of the Group and the number of executive directors on the board of the Company, the
directors have concluded that there are no prescribed officers of the Company. |
| Directors’ service
contracts |
Directors do not have fixed‑term service contracts. |
| Directors’ and officers’
disclosure of interest in
contracts |
None of the current directors had a material interest in any contract of significance to which the Company or any of its
subsidiaries was a party during the financial year. During the financial year no contracts were entered into in which
directors and officers of the Company had an interest and which significantly affected the business of the Group. The
directors had no interest in any third party or company responsible for managing any of the business activities of the
Group. |
| Conflict of interest |
The board recognises the importance of acting in the best interest of the Company and protecting the legitimate
interests and expectations of its stakeholders. The board consistently applies the provisions of the Companies Act on
disclosing or avoiding conflicts of interest. Directors are required to declare their interests in general annually and
specifically at each meeting of the board. |
| Statutory powers |
Section 66(1) of the Companies Act provides that the business and affairs of a company must be managed by or
under the direction of its board which has the authority to exercise all the powers and perform all the functions of the
company, except to the extent that the Companies Act or the Company’s Memorandum of Incorporation provides
otherwise.
The general powers of the directors are set out in the Company’s Memorandum of Incorporation. The directors have
further unspecified powers and authority for matters that may be exercised and dealt with by the Company, which are
not expressly reserved to shareholders of the Company in general meeting. |
| Insider trading |
Through appropriate procedures, the board ensures that no director, manager, employee or nominees or members of
their immediate family deals directly or indirectly in the securities of the Company on the basis of unpublished
price-sensitive information nor during the embargo period determined by the board in terms of a formal policy
implemented by the company secretary. A list of people who are restricted for this purpose has been approved by the
board and is revised from time to time. Dealings in the Company’s securities by directors and officers are listed and
circulated at every board meeting for noting. The Listings Requirements of the JSE Limited extend obligations on
transactions in the Company’s securities to include those of any major subsidiary. Directors or officers of the
Company’s major subsidiaries, whether wholly or partially owned, are also included in the list of directors, company
secretary and other officers. |
| Company secretary |
Mr CA Brighten is the Group company secretary, duly appointed by the board in accordance with the Companies Act.
The secretariat is available to provide a central source of guidance and advice within the Company on matters of
business ethics and good governance. The secretariat also aims to provide the highest standard of compliance with
the statutory and regulatory requirements. |
2. Assurance
Bidvest over the last four years has made a significant investment in developing and growing a robust, independent, risk-focused internal audit function that delivers real value and benefit to the Group. A risk-based internal audit methodology has been applied, with input from divisional management and aligned to the organisation’s risk management processes. Although not reliant on external auditors for any resource support, the internal audit function, in accordance with the Group’s combined assurance model, continues to liaise with the external auditors, and other assurance providers identified, to maximise efficiencies in assurance coverage on key risks.
The annually prepared internal audit plan embraces the principle of combined assurance, and is presented to the audit committee for review and approval. The audit committee considers the objectives and rationale that drive the plan in order to achieve the objectives of internal audit processes. Internal audit plans will be considered quarterly assessing the ability of the plan to meet the objectives of the Group audit committee.
The Bidvest internal audit vision is to provide a progressive and responsive service that objectively evaluates the business processes and internal controls so as to appropriately support management’s efforts in creating a strong control environment to achieve operational excellence. The significant investment in training and the skills injection through recruitment of highly qualified internal audit managers has seen a marked improvement in the overall quality and standard of assurance provided to management by internal audit. Given the increasing dependencies of businesses on information technology (IT), specialised IT auditing and consulting skills are being developed within the internal audit team, and will continue to be a major area of focus and development.
The purpose, authority and responsibility of the internal audit function are defined in a board-approved charter that is consistent with the Institute of Internal Auditors’ definition of internal auditing, and the principles of King III. Internal audit has focused on the following main areas, as required by King III:
 |
Objectively assessing the effectiveness of the risk management process, internal financial control (including an assessment of the adequacy of accounting records) and overall operational internal control |
 |
Systematically analysing and evaluating business processes and associated controls |
 |
Evaluating the Company’s governance processes |
 |
Providing a source of information, as appropriate, on instances of fraud, corruption, unethical behaviour and irregularities. |
Refer to the audit committee report on page 84.
Internal audit continued to function independently and objectively throughout the Group in the past year. The internal audit manager within each division, as well as at Group level, report functionally to the chairman of the respective divisional audit committee. Unrestricted access to members of the audit committee and executives of the organisation is available to the internal audit function. In addition, regular separate meetings between internal audit and the chairman of the divisional and Group audit committees took place during the year under review.
3. Compliance
Bidvest recognises that its greatest risk of non-compliance stems from a weakness within the practical impact of the legislation on each business. Each company is required to identify legislation that applies to the environments in which it operates, as well as the categories of information held relating to this legislation. Awareness programmes from a Group level do update management on legislative changes that are pervasive to the Group.
Bidvest is listed on the JSE Limited, and as such the board annually confirms that the Company complies with the Listings Requirements of the JSE Limited. The board places strong emphasis on the highest standards of financial management, accounting and reporting. The financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). For non-financial aspects, the Company has adopted the Global Reporting Initiatives’ (GRI G3.1) sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance. The board has appointed a social and ethics committee. The board has placed the compliance of these Group-wide acts as well as industry and regional acts on the agenda of both the Group risk committee where exposures have been identified and on Group social and ethics committee where compliance is monitored.
Refer to the social and ethics committee report on page 90.
The Group is committed to implementing the King III principles and best practice recommendations. Bidvest performs an annual review to assess the extent to which Bidvest continues to apply the principles and recommended practices in King III. This analysis identifies the actions taken to ensure application of the governance principles and those principles which will require ongoing attention and action.
For The Bidvest Group Limited’s detailed King III Governance Register, please follow this link:
For The Bidvest Group Limited’s detailed JSE Listings Requirements Compliance Register, please follow this link:
Bidvest has made use of the Institute of Directors Southern Africa (IoDSA) recommended Governance Assessment Instrument (GAI) as a selfassessment
tool to assess the extent of application of the King III recommended principles and practices.
The following table represents the high-level King III application register.
King III governance register at: June 30 2015
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Bidvest Group Limited – 1946/021180/06 |
IoDSA GAI score |
Applied/partially applied/
not applied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chapter 1: Ethical leadership and corporate citizenship |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 2: Boards and directors |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 3: Audit committees |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 4: The governance of risk |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 5: The governance of information technology |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 6: Compliance with laws, rules, codes and standards |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 7: Internal audit |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 8: Governing stakeholder relationships |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Chapter 9: Integrated reporting and disclosure |
AAA |
Applied |
|
| |
Overall score |
AAA |
|
|
AAA Highest application AA High application BB Notable application B Moderate application C Application to be improved L Low application
| King III principle |
Status update |
Areas of focus |
| 1. Ethical leadership and
corporate citizenship |
| – |
Code of ethics is annually reviewed |
| – |
Tip-offs line is operational, managed by an
independent third party supporting the values and
principles stated in the code of ethics |
|
| – |
An awareness campaign is planned to the Group
highlighting the positive role that has been played
by the tip-offs line to date and into the future |
|
| 2. Boards and directors |
| – |
Principles relating to performance assessments
have been applied and continue to develop as more
stringent performance measuring processes are
adopted |
| – |
Remuneration policy has been approved and
adopted, with King III principles notably being
applied |
|
| – |
Bidvest has engaged in a board level selfassessment,
reviewed by an independent party
reporting to the nominations committee |
|
| 3. Audit committees |
| – |
Bidvest has reviewed and updated the composition
of the Group audit committee in line with King III
recommendations |
|
| – |
Reporting templates and guidance is currently
under review to ensure optimal benefits are
achieved through this key governing body |
|
| 4. The governance of risk |
| – |
Divisional risk committee structures have been
established, meeting quarterly and reviewed by the
divisional audit committee structure |
|
| – |
Ongoing reviews of the key material risk exposures
are performed and where necessary interventions
initiated by the board |
|
| 5. The governance of
information technology |
| – |
Group IT forum has been established creating an
environment for divisional IT teams to engage, share
best practice and drive ongoing innovation |
| – |
IT governance framework is in place, with
assurance function being performed by internal
audit |
|
| – |
Internal audit assurance and review will continue
reporting in to both the risk and audit committee
structures |
|
| 6. Compliance with laws, rules, codes an |
| – |
Risk management focuses on the identification and management of the ever-increasing onerous regulatory environment, the decentralised structure of Bidvest facilitates close management of this process at grass roots level |
|
| – |
Ongoing investment into training and updates for all staff is an annual focus of the management teams |
| – |
Review of online solutions to provide updates as regulatory environment changes is underway |
|
| 7. Internal audit |
| – |
Internal audit provides an opinion to the audit committee with regards to the current state of internal control, internal financial control and risk management |
| – |
Internal audit adopts a risk-based audit approach, with exposure to the risk management process throughout the Group |
|
| – |
Internal audit continuously reviews the audit approach to ensure the key risks of the environment in which they are operating are the key focus driving their approach |
| – |
Upskilling, training and adapting to a changing operating environment are key to keeping internal audit relevant and value adding |
|
| 8. Governing stakeholder relationships |
| – |
Management teams identify key stakeholder groups and report to Group risk social and ethics committee the communication processes in place to monitor and strengthen these relationships |
|
| – |
There are pockets of excellence both divisionally and across the spread of stakeholders that exist. Where weaknesses have been identified, Bidvest Group is assisting the individual management teams to put in place workshops, communication plans and reporting mechanisms to ensure these are addressed |
|
| 9. Integrated reporting and disclosure |
| – |
Bidvest has successfully made use of a variety of mediums for better reporting and disclosure, using printed and soft copy materials, as well as web-based content |
|
| – |
Bidvest annually proactively seeks out feedback from third-party sources to continue to grow and develop the annual integrated report |
|
4. Risk management
Our commitment to building and sustaining an ethical organisational culture is entrenched in our vision, mission, strategies and operations. While the board has ultimate responsibility for the Company’s ethics performance, executive management is responsible for setting up a well-designed and properly implemented ethics management process.
A prime duty of the board, its committees, directors, officers of the Group and managers is to ensure our code of conduct is honoured. Annually the board reviews the code of ethics and ensures continued alignment of this code with the Bidvest values. The code demands highest standards of integrity, ethics and behaviour in all conduct and dealings; non-discriminatory employment and promotion practices; supporting employees through training and development to reach their full potential; and proactive engagement on environmental, social and sustainability matters.
As an outward measure of support and protection of this code and the Bidvest Values, the board continues to support the process of confidential reporting (whistle-blowing) of fraud, theft, breach of ethics and other risks. This is an outsourced independent and confidential system for stakeholders to report unethical, dishonest or improper behaviour, including non-compliance with Company policies, as well as corruption and fraud. All reported incidents are investigated by management and, where appropriate, action is taken. In line with legislation, our well-communicated commitment not to victimise whistle blowers ensures transparency and promotes ethical conduct. The identity of whistle blowers is protected by the service provider.
The board has appointed a risk committee to assist the board in recognising all material risks to which the Group is exposed and ensuring that the requisite risk management culture, policies and systems are progressively implemented and functioning effectively. Management is accountable to the board for implementing and monitoring the processes of risk management and integrating this into day-to-day activities. Divisionally, risk committees and risk registers are engaged to actively focus management on critical issues faced at a business and industry level. These are reported to the Group risk committee for consideration at a board level. The risk committee membership is annually reviewed.
Refer to the risk committee report on page 91.
We have integrated King III recommendations, and these along with identified Group requirements make up the overall function of the committee being an ongoing enterprise-wide risk assessment process supports the Group philosophy. This ensures risks and opportunities are adequately identified, evaluated and managed at the appropriate level in each division, and that their individual and joint impact on the Group is considered. The internal auditors assist in evaluating the effectiveness of the risk management process and comment on this in their own assessment reports.
Key material issues summary
Closely linked to those driving the decentralised strategy within the Group’s operations are those responsible for driving the risk identification and
mitigation processes. The key material issues identified below have emerged as a result of analysing and understanding the direction in which each
entity is moving. Set out below is a summary of the more material areas of focus emerging from the Group’s deliberations over the past period and
areas of focus as we look ahead. Refer to the business model on pages 4 to 6.
 |
Our human and intellectual
capital is our people’s
competencies, their experience
and business knowledge |
|
Material focus areas |
Commentary |
| |
Small talent pool and
limited skilled
resources |
 |
Management continually seeks talent and identify skills within their
businesses with the aim of growing talented individuals into new
roles. Job creation remains a core objective. |
 |
In South Africa, B-BBEE regulation increases the focus on talent
management risk in view of the country’s small talent pool.
However, graduate and learnership programmes gave impetus to
staff development. |
|
| |
Succession planning |
 |
Successful career planning and promotion are evident as new
management teams are driving stronger performance. Key
employees are identified possessing skills and relationships that
may be difficult to replicate or replace. |
|
| |
Industrial action |
 |
As a service provider, we are affected by industrial action in key
sectors such as mining; transport; municipalities; and metal
workers. |
 |
Management keeps open communication lines with unions
and staff. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Our financial capital
(manufacture/infrastructure) comprises 51% international
shareholder base, a vote of
condence in Bidvest and its
people |
|
Increasingly complex
business environment |
 |
Globally, legislative developments increasingly create a more
complex environment. |
 |
The proliferation of regulatory requirements across all industries
and territories added to costs, while consuming a growing amount
of management time. |
|
| |
Increasingly onerous
and challenging tax
regulations |
 |
Tax compliance obligations are high in most jurisdictions around
the world; with tax authorities targeting large corporate entities to
ensure strict compliance. |
|
| |
Cost-effective IT
systems and support
structures |
 |
To achieve the organisation’s objectives, Bidvest has adapted its
IT governance framework to support the effective and efficient
management of people, technology and information. |
 |
Management remains closely involved and are increasingly
supported by internal audit, specifically the risk and audit
committee, to ensure adherence to Group IT frameworks and
guidelines. |
|
| |
Asset management |
 |
Management actively monitors and drives performance in asset
management specifically through ambitious working capital targets
that are required to be achieved in each business. |
 |
Working capital management receives focused attention of the
audit committee structures; management of debtors remains a
priority; collection discipline was well maintained and the incidence
of bad debt well controlled; inventory levels were closely
monitored. |
 |
Credit risk has become crucial. We respond by staying close to
customers and the project market while having recourse to credit
guarantees and insurance. Creditors’ terms were robustly
negotiated. |
 |
Instances of fraud and theft are a reality, and are dealt with on a
zero tolerance basis as proactively as possible; early detection and
mitigation is a vital element. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
Our social and relationship
capital goes to brand
reputation and working together
with our customers and
suppliers to nd value adding
solutions within their specic
industries |
|
Remaining
competitive and
relevant |
 |
Critical to the Group’s success is the ability of management to
ensure their businesses remain relevant in rapidly evolving
environments. Management needs to anticipate the impact of
market change and respond promptly. |
 |
The entrepreneurial spirit within Bidvest facilitates an environment
that thrives on innovation and change; embracing the agility to
adapt quickly and proactively to changing customer and economic
requirements. |
|
| |
Fostering positive
long-term
relationships with key
suppliers and
customers |
 |
This remains a cornerstone of the way Bidvest does business and
is recognised as a Bidvest strength. Management is constantly
challenged to manage and further grow these relationships. |
 |
Communication with customers is key as they look to us to implement
smart solutions that improve efficiency and create savings. |
 |
Similarly, we constantly look for new sources of supply; we are
particularly interested in developing local sources to cut emissions
and fuel bills. |
|
| |
Nurturing long-term
ongoing relationships
with government |
 |
Relationships with government departments continue as significant
contracts are renegotiated. |
 |
Changing BEE code requirements, especially when interpretations
differ regarding these regulations and requirements, require
innovative solutions. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
We have a low carbon footprint.
In our denition of natural
capital we continually strive to
minimise our environmental
impact and leave our planet in
good working order for future
generations |
|
Energy crisis |
 |
The electricity crisis in South Africa has had a major impact on an
already struggling economy; load shedding has placed a
significant strain on operations in South Africa. |
 |
Efforts have been stepped up in the area of alternative power
solutions; special attention is being paid to large-scale solar
systems; roll-out of back-up generating capacity had been
completed to our large operations while inverters had been
installed at all operations of significant size. |
 |
The constructive nature of interaction with staff was confirmed
when our businesses engaged in negotiating flexible working
practices to minimise load-shedding impacts. |
 |
Growth opportunities were identified in power factor correction;
these systems optimise power transmission efficiency, correct
faults, prevent spikes and minimise damage to electronics;
growing demand is expected for technology such as this as power
tariffs rise. |
|
| |
Food contamination |
 |
This is a key risk actively managed by all food businesses. |
 |
Health and safety standards across all jurisdictions are stringent in
their application and review. |
 |
More focus on safety systems is a key management drive to
ensure consistency in standards. |
|
| |
Environmental impact
consciousness |
 |
Our companies seek win-win gains through cost savings that
deliver environmental gains; fuel costs have been contained
through route optimisation; businesses make increasing use of
video and telephone conferencing to reduce travel costs; we scan
the new technology horizon for new ideas. |
 |
Environmental and recycling initiatives have been in place for many
years. |
|