Bidvest
The Bidvest Group Limited
Annual report 2008
 
 
Review of operations  
 
Downloads |
|
Decrease font size   Increase font size   E-mail page   Print page
   
   
 
Anthony Dawe
Chief executive
   
 
  • Revenue up 17,2% to R22,0 billion
  • Trading profit of R690,8 million up 18,0%
  • Import volumes and buoyant commodity
    exports boost utilisation levels
  • IVS buoyed by strong bulk storage demand
  • Bulk Connections achieves 40% throughput growth
  • Many container facilities at near capacity
  • Exceptional grain-handling volumes
 

Value proposition

This southern African private sector freight management group has port- and airport-based assets, logistics expertise and supporting infrastructure to operate as the strategic partner of its customers. resources provide the reassurance of long-term relationships.

 
 

Sustainable development

In a hazardous operating environment, Bidfreight works to improve safety standards to world-class levels. The business continues to invest in recruitment and training of technical skills, both for operational productivity as well as to transform the workforce to reflect the country’s demographics.


Sustainable development indicator overview

   
Indicator 2008 2007
Employees 5 328 5 012
Total training spend (R’000) 20 175 18 355
Training spend per employee (R) 3 787 3 662
Employees attending HIV/Aids training (%) 23,0 25,3
Lost time injury frequency rate 9,1 8,4
Work-related fatalities (number) 3 1
BEE procurement (R’000) 1 656 496 547 541
BEE procurement as percentage of controllable spend 32,7  
CSI spend (R’000) 4 408 1 565
Enterprise development spend (R’000) 9 715
Total water usage (litres ’000) 300 076
Total electricity usage (kWh ’000) 51 983 50 512
Petrol (litres) 807 069 419 563
Diesel (litres) 5 538 579 3 482 354
Total carbon emissions (tonnes) 94 601
Carbon emissions per employee (tonnes) 17,8
Information not collated, not relevant or not entirely reliable    

Performance

Revenue of R22,0 billion (2007: R18,8 billion) was up by 17,2% while trading profit rose 18,0% to R690,8 million (2007: R585,6 million). Results were somewhat ahead of expectations, driven by exceptionally high volume throughput across Bidfreight’s port-based assets.

Utilisation levels were sustained by large import volumes (principally wheat, maize and bulk liquids) and buoyant commodity exports (chiefly coal and manganese).

Strategic drivers

The adage remains true that Bidfreight does well when South Africa does well, but the reverse applies to only a limited extent. When South Africa stalls, most of Bidfreight keeps moving. This is because the consumer drives most of the national economy, but Bidfreight is mainly focused on commodity flow and bulk cargo.



In the second half of the year, Bidfreight businesses handling items for the domestic consumer market were obviously affected by the drying up of disposable household income. Imports from the East were down year-on-year. However, primary products for import and export were largely unaffected by interest rates, inflation and the credit squeeze.

Though South African GDP growth eased in the second half of the year, it remained high in historical terms at around 4%. Demand for petroleum products for industry and the country’s little sign of abating. This supported high tank utilisation levels in an increasingly important part of our business.

Cyclical factors were also positive as agricultural volumes raced ahead for most of the year.

A somewhat softer rand and higher interest rates were generally beneficial for freight forwarding and marine services.

One strategic “positive” that failed to materialise was the long-awaited revival of freight volumes into and out of Africa. Zimbabwe, once a strong exporter, remains in limbo. The economies of several other African countries seem to be in the early stages of revival, but cannot provide the volumes that might make up for the significant reduction of import and export activity by South Africa’s northern neighbour.

Industry factors

The increase in fixed investment by the South African government is beneficial as it results in a continued stream of imported capital goods and major project items; for example, machinery and equipment for Gautrain and for Eskom’s the expansion of national infrastructure has not involved our ports to any great extent – with the exception of the Coega project.

Without new berths and with little expansion in recent years of facilities at Durban and other established ports, steadily rising demand is evident for the limited warehousing and dry and liquid bulk capacity.

It is difficult to add to our facilities footprint at the quayside until investment strategy rolls out. Therefore, the accent increasingly falls on efficiency and throughput improvements with the facilities at hand. Congestion and capacity bottlenecks in and around South Africa’s harbours enhancing for Bidfreight as high demand for storage facilities protects our margins.

Significant efficiency improvements were seen with the Durban bulk exporting operations of Transnet Freight Rail. This challenged us to achieve ongoing improvements in our bulk handling capacity.

The only major negatives relate to the over-traded nature of South Africa's distribution industry. Pressure on margins is ever present. Bidfreight refuses to operate at a loss. Contracts were reviewed; some were renegotiated and some were lost. This led to the closure of some smaller facilities.

 
Top