Impairment of assets
The carrying value of assets is reviewed at each balance
sheet date to assess whether there is any indication
of impairment. If any such indication exists, the recoverable
amount of the asset is estimated. Where the carrying
value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, such
assets are written down to their recoverable amount.
The recoverable amount of cash-generating units to which
goodwill is allocated is estimated annually on March 31
each year. For assets that have an indefinite useful life
and intangible assets that are not yet available for use,
the recoverable amount is estimated at each balance sheet
date.
Impairment losses are recognised whenever the carrying
amount of the asset or a cash-generating unit exceeds its
recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in
the income statement.
Impairment losses recognised in respect of cash-generating
units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount
of any goodwill allocated to cash-generating units and
then to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets
in the unit on a pro rata basis.
A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable asset
group that generates cash flows that largely are independent
from other assets and groups.
Financial assets are impaired where there is objective
evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred
after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the
estimated future cash flows of the investment have been
impacted.
An impairment loss in respect of an available-for-sale
financial asset is calculated by reference to its current
fair value. For unlisted shares classified as available-for-sale,
a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of
the security below its cost is considered to be objective
evidence of impairment.
For all other financial assets, objective evidence of
impairment could include:
– significant financial difficulty of the counterparty;
or
– default in interest or principal payments; or
– it becoming probable that the counterparty will enter
bankruptcy or financial re-organisation.
When a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale
financial asset has been recognised directly in equity
and there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired,
the cumulative loss that had been recognised directly in
equity is recognised in the income statement even though
the financial asset has not been derecognised. The amount
of the cumulative loss that is recognised in the income
statement is the difference between the acquisition cost
and current fair value, less any impairment loss on that
financial asset previously recognised in the income statement.
The recoverable amount of the Group’s investments in held-to-maturity
is calculated as the present value of estimated future
cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest
rate (the effective interest rate is computed on initial
recognition of these financial assets). Receivables with
a short duration are not discounted. Individually significant
financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual
basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively
in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics.
In respect of trade receivables, receivables that are
assessed not to be impaired individually are subsequently
assessed for impairment on a collective basis. Objective
evidence of impairment for a portfolio of receivables could
include the Group’st experience of collecting payments,
an increase in the number of delayed payments in the portfolio
past the average credit period, as well as observable changes
in national or local economic conditions that correlate
with default on receivables.
The recoverable amount of other assets is the greater
of their fair value less costs to sell and their value
in use. In assessing their value in use, the estimated
future cash flows are discounted to their present value
using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific
to the asset.
An impairment loss in respect of a held-to-maturity security
or receivable carried at amortised cost is reversed if
the subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment
loss was recognised.
An impairment loss in respect of an investment in an equity
instrument classified as available-for-sale is not reversed
through the income statement. If the fair value of a debt
instrument classified as available-for-sale increases and
the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring
after the impairment loss was recognised in the income
statement, the impairment loss is reversed, with the amount
of the reversal recognised in the income statement.
The carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced
by the impairment loss directly for all financial assets
with the exception of trade receivables and banking advances,
where the carrying amount is reduced through the use of
an impairment allowance account. When a trade receivable
or banking advance is considered uncollectible, it is written
off against the impairment allowance account. Subsequent
recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited
against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying
amount of the impairment allowance account are recognised
in the income statement.
Impairment losses in respect of goodwill are not reversed.
In respect of other assets, impairment losses recognised
in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for
any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer
exists. Impairment losses are reversed if there has been
a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable
amount.
Impairment losses are reversed only to the extent that
the asset’s would have been determined, net of depreciation
or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised. |
Bidvest's vision lies in the realm of possibility
“Bidvest people put in a resilient performance and the Group achieved a creditable result.”
statement
“We refuse to participate in the recession and salute our employees for their efforts in exceptionally difficult trading conditions.”